The discussion on uniformity of practice among the “plain people” is not a new topic. It was part of the discussion in the major three-way split of the Brethren that occurred in the early 1880’s. It is certainly an issue still being discussed today.

It is clear in the New Testament that the Church is called to unity. The foundation for this unity is rooted in our love for God and our love for each other. The question we wrestle with is, “What does biblical unity look like in practice”? How do we define the differences between unity of the faith, unity of doctrine and unity of practice?

For the Anabaptist/Brethren community historically, much of the focus of uniformity has been on uniformity in dress. Certainly that is not the only issue. Uniformity in carrying out the ordinances and uniformity in the patterns of worship services have also been also valued highly.

One of the issues raised by the Brethren “Progressives” in the 1880’s was the “uniform garb”. They argued that they strongly held to the biblical principles of modesty and separation, but they did not feel a uniform garb could be defended biblically. So, the discussion is not new by any means.

It is interesting that the issue of “uniforms” is being debated today outside of church circles. One particular discussion involves uniforms for school students. Another discussion revolves around the practice of uniforms for employees.

I did a little research a found the following pros and cons being raised concerning school uniforms.

Pros:

1. They prevent or reduce bullying.
2. Reduces peer pressure related to clothing fashions.
3. Creates uniformity between socio-economic classes.
4. Helps prevent cliques and gangs.

Cons:

1. Reduces the expression of individuality.
2. Does not prevent students from finding a way to rebel against the rules.
3. May limit the concept of diversity.
4. Can be uncomfortable.
5. It is difficult to create consistent rules about uniforms.

When it comes to the idea of uniforms in the work place and for professionals the following reasons have been given to support the practice:

1. Uniforms clearly identify employees.
2. It creates a team-building environment.
3. It helps with brand awareness.
4. It identifies people as employees and not customers or outsiders.

One question that needs answered is whether it is appropriate to take pragmatic solutions for societal issues and apply them to the Church?

It would be my personal observation that “uniformity” to some degree is deeply imbedded in Anabaptist/Brethren thinking. It is there even if no serious thought has been given to the matter. In many ways it feels right. But there have always been those who challenge the validity of the concept of uniformity, especially in applications of outward appearance.

I am hearing this issue being discussed currently. I am being asked what my opinion would be on the matter. I am finding differences of opinion, even in the younger generations.

I would really like to hear your perspective. I think we all understand that ultimately it is the Word that is authoritative, not tradition. Is tradition a blessing or a curse, or can it be both depending how we use it. Has uniformity provided any stability to groups of believers? Does it ever hinder spiritual maturity? Does the concept of wisdom apply in this discussition? We find in the Bible that some behaviors are not sin, but they may not be wise either.

Again, I would like to hear your thoughts. Feel free to invite others to this blog that might be interested in the discussion. Share your thoughts and your questions. And certainly this issue is not limited to dress and outward appearance.

DSJ